Why Did America Choose Diem? Eisenhower’s Decision in 1954
Overview
In the summer of 1954, the French colonial empire in Indochina collapsed. After the decisive defeat at Dien Bien Phu and the Geneva Accords, Vietnam was divided at the 17th parallel. The question was: Who would lead South Vietnam?
The United States chose Ngo Dinh Diem—a Catholic nationalist who had spent years in exile and had no power base in Saigon. Why did Eisenhower make this seemingly risky choice? And what did this decision mean for South Vietnam’s state-building?
Historical Background
The Fall of French Indochina
France had ruled Vietnam since the 1880s. After WWII, Ho Chi Minh declared independence, but France attempted to reassert control. The First Indochina War (1946-1954) ended with France’s catastrophic defeat at Dien Bien Phu in May 1954.
The Geneva Accords (July 1954) divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel:
- North: Democratic Republic of Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh)
- South: State of Vietnam (Emperor Bao Dai)
- Nationwide elections scheduled for 1956
Everyone knew Ho Chi Minh would win any free election. The US needed someone who could build a viable anti-communist state in the South before those elections.
America’s Options
The US faced limited choices:
Bao Dai: The former Emperor had French backing but was seen as a playboy puppet with no popular legitimacy.
Nguyen Van Hinh: The Army Chief had military power but was too close to the French.
Various sect leaders: The Cao Dai, Hoa Hao, and Binh Xuyen controlled significant territory and private armies, but lacked national vision.
Ngo Dinh Diem: A Catholic nationalist with anti-French, anti-communist credentials. He had refused to collaborate with both the French and Ho Chi Minh.
Why Diem?
The Anti-Communist Credentials
Diem’s biography seemed perfect for Cold War America:
- Former mandarin under Emperor Bao Dai
- Resigned rather than accept French control
- Refused Ho Chi Minh’s offer to join his government
- Catholic in a Buddhist country (seen as reliably anti-communist)
- Years in exile in the US, networked with American Catholics
Cardinal Spellman and Senator Mike Mansfield championed Diem in Washington. The “Vietnam Lobby” portrayed him as Asia’s answer to anti-communism.
The “Third Force” Theory
American policymakers believed in finding a “third force”—neither colonial nor communist. Diem seemed to fit this category:
- Nationalist credentials (refused French collaboration)
- Anti-communist credentials (refused Ho Chi Minh)
- Not tainted by colonial collaboration
- Educated and articulate
In reality, Diem had no power base. He had been in exile for years, had no army, no party, and few supporters in Saigon. But the Americans believed they could build these from scratch.
State-building Challenges
The Sect Problem
When Diem arrived in Saigon in July 1954, he faced immediate challenges:
- Cao Dai: Religious sect with 2 million followers and 25,000 soldiers
- Hoa Hao: Buddhist sect with 1.5 million followers and 15,000 soldiers
- Binh Xuyen: Criminal organization controlling Saigon police and casinos
These sects controlled more territory and soldiers than Diem’s government. The French had bought their loyalty with subsidies. Could Diem do the same—or would he have to fight?
The Military Question
The Vietnamese National Army was a French creation, loyal to French commanders. Army Chief Nguyen Van Hinh openly plotted against Diem. How could Diem build a state without controlling his own military?
The Refugee Crisis
After partition, nearly 1 million refugees fled from North to South—most of them Catholics. They needed to be resettled, fed, and integrated. This was both a crisis and an opportunity: the refugees could become Diem’s loyal base.
America’s Gamble
Eisenhower’s Calculation
The Eisenhower administration made a calculated bet:
- Risk: Diem had no power base and might fail
- Reward: If successful, a non-communist South Vietnam would contain Chinese expansion
- Alternative: Without intervention, Ho Chi Minh would unify Vietnam
The “domino theory” shaped American thinking: if Vietnam fell to communism, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia would follow. South Vietnam became the front line of containment in Asia.
The Commitment
America committed to Diem in October 1954:
- Direct aid to Diem’s government (bypassing the French)
- Military advisory mission
- Support against internal enemies
The question remained: Could Diem actually build a state?
State-building Analysis
Political Leadership
Diem had personal integrity but serious limitations:
- Mandarin mentality: Saw himself as a Confucian ruler, not a democratic leader
- Distrust of everyone outside family: Would rely heavily on brother Ngo Dinh Nhu
- No political experience: Had been in exile, not building coalitions
Bureaucratic Apparatus
The state Diem inherited was a French colonial creation:
- Officers trained by French, loyal to French
- Civil servants experienced but demoralized
- No nationalist bureaucratic tradition
Social Forces
Diem faced powerful autonomous forces:
- Religious sects with private armies
- Criminal organizations
- French-aligned military officers
- Buddhist majority skeptical of Catholic leader
Foreign Power
American support was essential but conditional:
- Aid depended on Diem showing results
- Many American officials doubted Diem could succeed
- France opposed Diem, preferred their own candidates
The Road Ahead
By late 1954, Diem’s survival seemed unlikely. The sects plotted against him. The army chief wanted him gone. Even some Americans thought he should be replaced.
Yet Diem would survive, defeat the sects, consolidate power, and build something resembling a state. How he did this—through a combination of American support, divide-and-conquer tactics, and ruthless political maneuvering—would shape South Vietnam’s fate.
America chose Diem because they had no better options. Whether that choice was wise would only become clear years later, in the jungles and rice paddies of the Vietnam War.
South Vietnam State-Building Series
▶ Next: [S.Vietnam 2] How Diem Survived 1954 Saigon